Conjugating Irregular German Strong Verbs

The Salem Witch Trials Questionable And Scandalous Time

The Salem Witch Trials were a questionable and scandalous time in New England history that led to the deaths of 14 women and 6 men, all of whom had been charged with practicing witchcraft. The trials were the result of the strange and unexplainable behavior of two young girls, who exhibited violent convulsions and uncontrollable outburst of screaming and fits that left them unable to see,speak or hear. After a local doctor examined them and found no physical reason for their fits, diagnosed them as bewitched. This diagnosis sent salem into hysteria and in the summer of 1692, nearly 200 people were accused and arrested for practicing witchcraft. In January of 1692, Betty Parris, age nine, and Abigail Williams, age eleven, the daughter and niece of Reverend Samuel Parris, began having what was recorded as fits. The girls threw things around the room, uttered strange sounds and contorted their bodies. They also started covering their ears during sermons. After their diagnosis, other you ng girls in the village began exhibiting the same symptoms. In February, scared by events, the villagers held fasts and prayed for the afflicted. Wanting the influence of witchcraft out of the village, the girls were pressured into providing names of whomever had bewitched them. Three women were named, Sarah Good, Sarah Osburne and an old slave named Tituba. It was easy to believe that the three women were guilty due to them being unpopular within the village. Sarah Good was a beggar and had

Rhetorical Analysis Essay Cunt, a Declaration of...

Inga Muscio is a very influential writer. Over the years she has earned tremendous credibility within the feminist world. In the chapter, â€Å"Rape not Cunt,† from her well known book Cunt, a Declaration of Independence, Inga passionately writes of her feelings about violence against women. She attempts to use rhetoric and captures the reader with a call of action to help prevent further violence against women. However, although Inga Muscio had many valid points about violence against women, her rhetoric does not appeal to all audiences. Generally speaking, when someone speaks of an emotional topic such as rape or abuse, they are sympathetic and supporting. However, in Inga’s writing she exhibits neither of these characteristics. In her†¦show more content†¦I do not feel that any progress would be made if our men just sat in the background watching when there is so much that needs to be done. Inga discredits our men and ignores the fact that any help efforts are good whether they be from a male or a female. Furthermore, Inga’s suggested solutions to the issue of violence against women are ridiculous. In the chapter she suggests that women use â€Å"Cuntlovin Public Relations† (Muscio 170) to resolve the issue. In her opinion, packing the car of a known rapist with rotting fish heads and Limburger cheese, or covering him in bloody tampons, would solve the problem. However, solutions such as these would just seem immature to many of Inga’s readers. Inga’s readers are in sea rch of clear-cut solutions that will without a doubt prevent future sexual assaults. Inga’s solutions would do nothing other than let the rapist know that you act much younger than your actual age. She states in her writing, â€Å"Wouldn’t you just hate like the devil to be pilloried, smeared with dogshit, forced to kneel in front of a high-powered microphone on a raised platform and apologize to the ten thousand women who have solemnly marched by you (Muscio 170)?† Public humiliation of every rapist is not the proper way to prevent violence against women. Acting in this manner just makes the rapist appear as a victim to the torture of ten thousand crazy feminists. We do not want to make the rapist

Foundations of Language Development

Question: Describe how you would use Sunday in the Park for your own educational context. Explain how would you exploit this text for language teacher development? Answer: In Bel Kaufman's "Sunday in the Park", there are several themes and truths discussed in an ordinary scene. The speech used by the author is Heteroglossia as it has more than one expressed viewpoints in the text. One of the major challenges in a language learner experience is the proper use of adjectives for describing characters, events and settings. There are a few tasks that can be pursued by the teacher for influencing efficiency in the language class. The different characters and view-point form a situation for debate for the speech by the lead characters of the story (Lenneberg and Lenneberg 2014). There are two methods through which language can be developed for the story- Debate from humanity point of view and writing a dialog journal for helping the students properly use adjectives. For debate, the student would be divided into two groups to stand in favor or against of the woman. Time must be allowed for discussion. The debate activity can help in knowing different viewpoints from humanity point of view. The activity can deepen understanding and influence viewpoints of students through debating. By writing the dialog journal, the different viewpoints can be addressed. The ideas, experiences and reflections can be shared for improving communication between teachers and students (Hoff 2013). In conclusion, the two methodologies- debate and dialogue journal, used for language development help in defining students responses. The cultural elements, grammar structure and vocabulary can help the students in improving interaction skills. The exchange of ideas and experiences gives a synthesis of personal evaluation and shows literature from multiple standpoints. The debate and dialogue journal would promote excitement and motivation among learners and learn the language written in it. Thus, teachers need to find their own way of manipulating the class in a seemingly desirable way (Lenneberg and Lenneberg 2014). References Hoff, E., 2013.Language development. 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning. Lenneberg, E. and Lenneberg, E., 2014.Foundations of language development. 3rd ed. New York: Academic Press.